In this blog post, we'll look into the mathematics of what is going on.
But let's start with a simple case of a company owning its own stock.
Suppose we have a stock price S, with a total of N shares issued, of which n are held by the company itself.
Let M be the value of the companies assets, excluding the shares that it holds in itself.
So we have the total valuation is the total number of shares multiplied by the share price, which is also equal to the valuation M plus the shares it holds in itself:
So far so good.
On the other hand, if we were to let a company declare its own shares on its balance sheet and treat them as a regular asset, then we could have a company valuation of (N S) and the owners of shares in the company would have an odd recursive ownership. When they bought shares they would be buying fractional ownership of more shares that the company held and those shares would have a fractional ownership of more shares etc.
Indeed if the company held many of it own shares, we could end up with a valuation being a large multiple of the main assets M.
Suppose we have a company valuation:
So, if we don't want to allow companies to give themselves infinite valuations, then we shouldn't let them declare the own stock on their balance sheet.
Suppose we have two companies and each buys stock in the other. Is this like a case of two snakes consuming eachother? If we look at the numbers, what happens to the company valuations and stock prices?
Let's label the companies 'a' and 'b'. We can say that the valuation of company 'a' is the number of outstanding shares times its share price. And we'll break that valuation into two parts, the main company and shares that the company holds in company 'b':
We have a similar expression for company b which holds
Suppose now company 'a' decides to buy a few more share in company 'b', what impact will that have on the two share prices?
We let the investment that 'a' makes in 'b' be
Company 'a' will need to get the cash for the shares from somewhere, so we need subtract
When the transaction is complete, we'll see what our equations suggest is the appropriate impact on the share price of companies 'a' and 'b'.
We'll let the adjusted share prices be
So, our model suggests that two firms buying shares in eachother doesn't cause price instability.
No comments:
Post a Comment